Modern
Blackjack
Strategy Comparisons
|
|||
Double-deck For two decks, bet spreads were 1-4 and 1-8. We see Hi-Opt II is the winner at all penetrations. Halves, in violet, comes in second through most penetrations, with AOII beating it at the far left. Of course all three of these strategies are very difficult. Next we see Zen in blue and UBZ II in green, with UBZ II performing better on the left side of the chart and Zen taking over on the right side. These strategies are not simple, but are easier than the top three. They were both designed for double-deck. Further down the centerline, we see RPC in yellow and FELT in cyan. RPC is comparable to Zen and UBZ in ease of use. FELT is somewhat simpler with compromised and fewer indexes. With six decks, FELT beat RPC. They are closer here because the more accurate RPC indexes are more important in double-deck. Next we see Mentor in red. Just below this, REKO in crimson and KISS III in olive. With two decks, KISS works better in poor penetrations and REKO in good penetrations. At the bottom, we find the popular Hi-Lo and then Hi-Opt I. Hi-Lo was used by the MIT teams, although with more indexes.
www.qfit.com/Book/z6202chart.gif
|
|||
© 2009 Norman Wattenberger |
|||
Join the Blackjack Community at Blackjack: The Forum |
|||
Link
to this page:
www.qfit.com/book/ModernBlackjackPage192.htm
|
|||