Modern
Blackjack
Scams/Myths
|
|||
Is preferential shuffling legal? Let us look at the relevant Nevada Statutes:
NRS 465.083 Cheating.
It is unlawful for any person, whether he is an owner or employee of or a player in an establishment, to cheat at any gambling game.
NRS 465.015 Definitions. As used in this chapter:
1. “Cheat” means to alter the elements of chance, method of selection or criteria which determine:
(a) The result of a game; (b) The amount or frequency of payment in a game; (c) The value of a wagering instrument; or (d) The value of a wagering credit.
In a casino game, the dealer can make no choices. Only the player can make choices. The player is allowed to alter his expectation. For example on Craps, he can bet Pass or Don’t Pass, which have slightly different expectations. At Blackjack, the elements of chance are set up. The player can do his best to increase his advantage by making playing and betting decisions according to the rules. However, if the dealer preferentially shuffles, she is altering the elements of chance. I am not a lawyer, but this certainly sounds like cheating. Further, since the odds of receiving an ace are not the same as the odds of receiving a five, this appears to constitute false advertising. Whether or not this is illegal under the law, I certainly believe that it is a scam. The odds have been changed such that they are worse than the rules suggest. Note: Some casinos will also shuffle when a bet has been raised without the player’s counting the cards. This is also sometimes referred to as Preferential Shuffling. While this hurts everyone at the table, it is less clear that this is a “scam.” I should point out that such practices are rare these days.
|
|||
© 2009 Norman Wattenberger |
|||
Join the Blackjack Community at Blackjack: The Forum |
|||
Link
to this page:
www.qfit.com/book/ModernBlackjackPage203.htm
|
|||