Modern Blackjack

Since it takes only one page, I thought I would include a chart of the advantages by count for several strategies. This is meant for reference only. You cannot make any comparative conclusions about a strategy based on advantage by count since they use different methods of count calculation.

These percentages are for six decks, S17, DAS, LS, 75% penetration. Indexes used are the Sweet 16 and Fab 4, except for the unbalanced counts at the end of the table. Some counts do not exist for some strategies due to the method of true count calculation. You will see that the unbalanced strategies at the end generally increase in advantage much less per count. That is because they use running counts, not the more compressed true counts.

Strategy	+1	+2	+3	+4	+5	+6	+7	+8	+9	+10
Canfield Expert	.41	.94	1.51	2.10	2.75	3.35	4.02	4.57	5.14	5.55
Hi-Lo	.50	1.08	1.64	2.25	2.88	3.48	4.04	4.57	5.17	5.49
Hi-Opt I (SC)	.55	1.18	1.84	2.47	3.12	3.76	4.34	4.87	5.33	5.78
Hi-Opt II (SC)	.17	.52	.85	1.20	1.54	1.91	2.32	2.69	3.00	3.42
FELT	.11	.42	.71	1.01	1.31	1.63	2.00	2.29	2.63	2.96
Mentor	-.02	.13	.30	.46	.64	.79	1.01	1.14	1.31	1.47
Omega II (SC)	.14	.46	.78	1.12	1.45	1.79	2.13	2.46	2.83	3.19
Revere Point Count	.55	1.15	1.82	2.49	3.15	3.76	4.44	5.20	5.35	5.97
Silver Fox	.37	.86	1.36	1.91	2.51	3.15	3.81	4.45	5.09	5.70
Uston Adv. +/-	1.19	2.40	3.65	4.75	5.73	6.55	7.79	9.41	10.1	-
Uston APC (SC)	.12	.56	1.01	1.49	1.98	2.47	2.90	3.40	3.80	4.15
Wong Halves	.50	1.08	1.65	2.24	2.86	3.52	4.11	4.71	5.29	5.94
Zen 1998	1.52	3.00	4.31	5.45	6.45	-	-	-	-	-
	-4	-3	-2	-1	0	+1	+2	+3	+4	+5
REKO/KO	.29	.46	.64	.84	1.07	1.30	1.54	1.80	2.08	2.36
UBZ II	.32	.44	.55	.62	.78	.87	1.03	1.11	1.25	1.38
UstonSS	.49	.55	.66	.74	.84	.92	.98	1.13	1.22	1.33
	+18	+19	+20	+21	+22	+23	+24	+25	+26	+27
KISS II	.40	.63	.84	1.04	1.30	1.52	1.80	2.13	2.37	2.68
KISS III	.37	.52	.73	.94	1.16	1.37	1.64	1.83	2.15	2.40

Advantages by Count